[c-nsp] Quick routing question.
Heath Jones
hj1980 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 9 14:10:21 EDT 2010
I noticed that too Jon, I think its just a display thing - because it's
saying the interface name it also shows the mac..
On 9 September 2010 18:34, Jon Lewis <jlewis at lewis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Drew Weaver wrote:
>
> [root at vmz bin]# tracert x.x.x.13
>> traceroute to x.x.x.13 (x.x.x.13), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>> 1 gw (gw) 0.486 ms 0.458 ms 0.463 ms
>> 2 core (core) 0.460 ms 0.710 ms 0.709 ms
>> 3 rtr (rtr) 0.427 ms 0.428 ms 0.425 ms
>> 4 x.x.x.Level3.net <http://x.x.x.level3.net/> (x.x.x.13) 3.238 ms
>> 3.238 ms 3.236 ms
>>
>
> So you have redistributed the new connection /30 into your IGP. With BGP
> not turned up, the return path is almost certainly not the reverse of the
> above...so is there some reason x.x.x.Level3.net<http://x.x.x.level3.net/>can't send packets back your way via the connected 10gigE? I assume if you
> ask a Level3 engineer to ping you at x.x.x.14 from x.x.x.Level3.net<http://x.x.x.level3.net/>,
> it doesn't work?
>
>
> rtr#sh ip arp
>> Protocol Address Age (min) Hardware Addr Type
>> Interface
>> Internet x.x.x.14 - xxxx.xxxx.a9dc ARPA
>> GigabitEthernet2/1/0
>> Internet x.x.x.13 14 xxxx.xxxx.4d7a ARPA
>> GigabitEthernet2/1/0
>> Internet x.x.x.12 - xxxx.xxxx.a9dc ARPA
>> GigabitEthernet2/1/0
>>
>
> That rules out my first guess. Though probably not related, why is there
> an arp entry for .12?
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
> Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
> Atlantic Net |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list