[c-nsp] C65K: Any significant correlation between import filter route-map complexity and BGP Router process utilization?

[Saku Ytti]

On (2010-09-13 11:08 -0400), Jeremy Reid wrote:

> Separate from the original question asked: We did find the true culprit for what was significantly elevating our RP CPU (BGP process) loads: An IPv6 peer that was activated under *both* the ipv6 AND ipv4 address-families... Once the errant ipv4 neighbor activate statement was removed, the session reset and we shed about 20% overall CPU for BGP router.

Without knowing your IOS, I'm fairly confident you were hitting CSCsy58115.

-- 
  ++ytti