[c-nsp] Cisco 4900M BGP Support

[Chris Evans]

Asr 1000  or small 7600 would be your answer.
On Sep 27, 2010 6:04 PM, "Jimmy Changa" <jimmy.changa007 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the info. I'm looking for a Cisco solution that takes up the
> least amount of rack space and can handle full table. Any suggestions?
>
> Jimmy Changa via Droid
> On Sep 27, 2010 5:47 PM, "Łukasz Bromirski" <lukasz at bromirski.net> wrote:
>> On 2010-09-27 23:16, Charles Klement wrote:
>>> I believe that there is only enough tcam to support about 250000 ipv4
> routes.
>>
>> Exactly. The 4900M job is not to be a edge BGP router. It's a
>> TOR switch.
>>
>> As usual, one can fiddle with the incoming prefixes filtering to get
>> everything still in FIB fitting the TCAMs, it's better than 11-20k FIB
>> limit for Cat 3Ks, but it's not the ASR 1k or 7600 Sup720BXL/CXL 1mln
>> of them.
>>
>> --
>> "Everything will be okay in the end. | Łukasz Bromirski
>> If it's not okay, it's not the end." | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/