[c-nsp] ASR9K VRF route leaking

[Anton Turygin]

That was my mistake.
I had to put redistribute static instaed of connected.

With "redistribute static" it is working fine.

;-)


On Fri, 8 Apr 2011, Anton Turygin wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Got some problems with configuring vrfs under IOS XR 4.0.
>
> have the following config:
>
> #sh run vrf
> Fri Apr  8 17:39:17.029 EEST
> vrf 1
> address-family ipv4 unicast
>  import route-target
>   1:1
>   2:2
>  !
>  export route-target
>   1:1
>   2:2
>  !
> !
> !
> vrf 2
> address-family ipv4 unicast
>  import route-target
>   1:1
>   2:2
>  !
>  export route-target
>   1:1
>   2:2
>  !
> !
> !
> #sh run router static vrf 1
> Fri Apr  8 17:39:28.190 EEST
> router static
> vrf 1
>  address-family ipv4 unicast
>   1.1.1.0/24 Null0
>  !
> !
> !
> #sh run router static vrf 2
> Fri Apr  8 17:39:29.663 EEST
> router static
> vrf 2
>  address-family ipv4 unicast
>   2.2.2.0/24 Null0
>  !
> !
> !
> #sh run router bgp
> [...]
> vrf 1
>  rd 1:1
>  address-family ipv4 unicast
>   redistribute connected
>  !
> !
> vrf 2
>  rd 2:2
>  address-family ipv4 unicast
>   redistribute connected
>
> #
>
>
> As per my understanding now the route 2.2.2.0/24 from vrf 2 should appear in 
> vrf 1 routing table (at least this kind of config would be enough for IOS 
> 12.2). But this does not happen.
>
> Can please anyone point me to the right piece of documentation.
> What am I missing?
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>

-- 
RAZ-RIPE
Technological Systems CJSC
Senior Network Engineer