[c-nsp] Redistributed EIGRP Route Preferred over EBGP?
Chris Mason
chris at noodles.org.uk
Mon Apr 18 13:31:05 EDT 2011
Hi,
I have a DMVPN setup running EIGRP between the HUB and SPOKES. The HUB
is then running E-BGP back to the core.
The HUB and SPOKES are all within the same EIGRP AS so the routes
being learnt are internal EIGRP routes.
I have remote sites which have a primary and secondary router with
EIGRP being used on the secondary router.
The primary router will be advertising the same prefixes via BGP.
On the HUB, I am redistributing the EIGRP learnt routes into BGP.
In the scenario below I am also learning the same prefix via BGP for
the sites primary circuit.
Based on the following output I would expect the BGP learnt route to
be preferred over the EIGRP redistributed route as I am setting a
weight of 64000 on the BGP route.
The EIGRP route will have a weight of 32768 because it is locally redistributed:
Router# show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf VPN-A 172.31.254.105/32
BGP routing table entry for 65222:400:172.31.254.105/32, version 125981
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table VPN-A)
Advertised to update-groups:
2 3 5 8
100 65000 65116
172.31.235.1 from 172.31.235.1 (172.16.0.33)
Origin incomplete, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 64000, valid, external
Extended Community: RT:65222:400
mpls labels in/out /nolabel
Local
172.31.238.166 from 0.0.0.0 (172.31.235.254)
Origin incomplete, metric 297372416, localpref 100, weight
32768, valid, sourced, best
Extended Community: RT:65222:400
Cost:pre-bestpath:128:297372416 (default-1850111231) 0x8800:32768:0
0x8801:44:12928000 0x8802:65281:284444416 0x8803:65362:1400
mpls labels in/out /nolabel
I can't work out why we are preferring the EIGRP path to the BGP path?
Does anyone have any ideas or am I missing something obvious?
Thanks,
Chris
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list