[c-nsp] PIM SSM behavior when receiving IGMPv3 *,G joins

John Neiberger jneiberger at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 13:53:29 EDT 2011


On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:43 AM, John Neiberger <jneiberger at gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's say we have an SSM range of 232/8 in our network. There is a
> multicast receiver connected to a 4948, which has a routed link to
> another 4948 running PIM and a routed link to a Cisco router, also
> running PIM. The multicast receiver sends the equivalent of a *,G
> join, which in SSM is a membership report set to EXCLUDE mode with a
> null source list. It's basically telling the switch, "I want to join
> x.x.x.x group and I don't care what the source is." What is the 4948
> supposed to do with that? I've read one page (non-Cisco site) that
> seemed to indicate that those sorts of joins would be dropped. Is that
> actually the case, or should the 4948 send a PIM message to its
> neighbors letting them know to forward that group to it if they have
> it available?
>
> I'm just not sure how this valid IGMPv3 join is supposed to be handled
> in an SSM environment. The situation has come up and I have no idea
> what the expected behavior is.
>
> Thanks!
> John
>

To answer my own question, I think, I just found this in RFC 4607:

   A router that receives such a
   non-source-specific request for data in the SSM range MUST NOT use
   the request to establish forwarding state and MUST NOT propagate the
   request to other neighboring routers.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list