[c-nsp] ip local policy (PBR routing question)

[Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer)]

Scott,

 
> PBR sounded like a fit here and local PBR specifically seemed to be the tool
> to use so I can route the voice from with in the IAD appropriately.  So I
> created the following.
> 
> route-map voice-control permit 10
> match ip addr VOIP-Control-ACL
> set ip default next-hop 209.x.x.33 (the far end of the attached /30 bound to
> the T1)
> 
> route-map voice-control permit 20
> match ip address VOIP-RTSP-acl
> set ip default next-hop 209.x.x.33 (again the far end of the T1)
> 
> route-map voice-control permit 30
> set default interface fast 0/1  ;sets the default to match the default
> statement in the routing table
> 
> Then in global
> 
> ip local policy route-map voice-control
> 
> Here’s my question.  I have some other static routes which I want to behave
> normally.  These are for the GRE tunnels to come up and some internal blocks
> routed over the tunnel.  (rfc1918 space)  Won’t the last line of the route
> map take priority and disrupt the normal behavior or am I wrong here?  Can I
> remove that line and the behavior will remain normal for routes not listed
> in the ACL / match set [...]

yes, you should be able to just remove the permit 30 route-map instance. All packets not matched by PBR route-maps are routed via the normal routing table.

	oli