[c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco

Ryan Finnesey rfinnesey at gmail.com
Sat Aug 13 19:54:17 EDT 2011


If I have the option to engineer to our  requirements I would use cisco at
the edge and Juniper at the core. 

 

Cheers

Ryan

 

 

From: Derick Winkworth [mailto:dwinkworth at att.net] 
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 9:08 AM
To: Gert Doering; Ryan Finnesey
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco

 

Engineer to your requirements.  Cisco and Juniper are good vendors to have
for variety.

 

 

Derick Winkworth
CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721
http://blinking-network.blogspot.com

 

 

  _____  

From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
To: Ryan Finnesey <rfinnesey at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Sent: Fri, August 12, 2011 2:52:44 AM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:00:32PM -0400, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
> What would be your preference between just Cisco or Juniper

"depends on what you want to do with it"

Recently, OS and TAC support quality at Juniper seriously went down the
drain, so the original reason to want Juniper "high quality operating
system and very motivated company to iron out the remaining wrinkles"
seems to have been lost...

OTOH, Cisco is still stuck in "we have too many operating systems and
we spend half our resources with BU in-fighting" mode - which, I guess,
will now be fixed by firing 10.000 folks from engineering so they won't
get in the way of the in-fighting anymore...

Right now, I'm not sure I'm trusting either company enough.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
 
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025
gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list