[c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
Scott Granados
scott at granados-llc.net
Mon Aug 15 23:25:32 EDT 2011
That sounds like a winning combination.
-----Original Message-----
From: judy teng
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 7:20 PM
To: 'Derick Winkworth' ; 'Gert Doering' ; Ryan Finnesey
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
That is exactly what I am doing in our network - ASR9K as edge and MX480 as
pure P router.
Judy
--- On Sat, 8/13/11, Ryan Finnesey <rfinnesey at gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Ryan Finnesey <rfinnesey at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
> To: "'Derick Winkworth'" <dwinkworth at att.net>, "'Gert Doering'"
> <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011, 11:54 PM
> If I have the option to engineer to
> our requirements I would use cisco at
> the edge and Juniper at the core.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Derick Winkworth [mailto:dwinkworth at att.net]
>
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 9:08 AM
> To: Gert Doering; Ryan Finnesey
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
>
>
>
> Engineer to your requirements. Cisco and Juniper are
> good vendors to have
> for variety.
>
>
>
>
>
> Derick Winkworth
> CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721
> http://blinking-network.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> To: Ryan Finnesey <rfinnesey at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Fri, August 12, 2011 2:52:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade Vs Cisco
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:00:32PM -0400, Ryan Finnesey
> wrote:
> > What would be your preference between just Cisco or
> Juniper
>
> "depends on what you want to do with it"
>
> Recently, OS and TAC support quality at Juniper seriously
> went down the
> drain, so the original reason to want Juniper "high quality
> operating
> system and very motivated company to iron out the remaining
> wrinkles"
> seems to have been lost...
>
> OTOH, Cisco is still stuck in "we have too many operating
> systems and
> we spend half our resources with BU in-fighting" mode -
> which, I guess,
> will now be fixed by firing 10.000 folks from engineering
> so they won't
> get in the way of the in-fighting anymore...
>
> Right now, I'm not sure I'm trusting either company
> enough.
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list