[c-nsp] MTU - issue while doing VPLS over VPLS!

Dipesh Basnet dipesh.basnyat at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 01:22:33 EDT 2011


CISCO1941-SEC/K9

Cisco 1941 Security Bundle w/SEC license PAK


CAB-ACSA

AC Power Cord (India/South Africa), C13, BS 546, 1.8m


S190UK9-15104M

Cisco 1900 IOS UNIVERSAL


PWR-1941-AC

Cisco 1941 AC Power Supply


ISR-CCP-EXP

Cisco Config Pro Express on Router Flash


MEM-1900-512MB-DEF

512MB Default DRAM for Cisco 1941 ISR


MEM-CF-256MB

256MB Compact Flash for Cisco 1900, 2900, 3900 ISR


SL-19-IPB-K9

IP Base License  for Cisco 1900


SL-19-SEC-K9

Security License  for Cisco 1900


CON-SNT-1941SEC

SMARTNET 8X5XNBD Cisco 1941 Security Bundle w/SEC license

 

Does above support GRE over VPLS as per the requirement below? 

 

Regards,
Dipesh Basnet

 

From: Dipesh Basnet [mailto:dipesh.basnyat at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:51 PM
To: 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'
Subject: RE: MTU - issue while doing VPLS over VPLS!

 

 

I have requirement of GRE over VPLS ? 

 

20 remote sites routers connect to one central cisco router.

 

Remote router : 3 WAN interface ,  100 kpps throughput , MPLS / VPLS /GRE
over VPLS

 

Central router : 4 WAN interface , 600-900 kpps throughput , MPLS / VPLS
/GRE over VPLS

 

Please provide me , make and model number to meet the above requirement of
CISCO routers

 

Regards,

Dipesh Basnet

From: Dipesh Basnet [mailto:dipesh.basnyat at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:39 PM
To: 'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'
Subject: MTU - issue while doing VPLS over VPLS!

 

Dear Sir ,

 

we are deploying Cisco metro Switch to create VPLS network as below.

 

PC-----Cisco Switch + Cisco switch ------------E1 Link [ service provider]
---------Cisco Switch + Cisco Switch -----internet 

 

For E1 link , we are using protocol converter that its Ethernet port only
support MTU 1500. That means we have MTU 1500 for backhaul link.

 

Now when we do VPLS or  VPLS over VPLS ,  There are some application not
working properly. 

 

I want to know ,  does Cisco Switch fragment the packet at its outer
interface of the switch that is connect to E1 link. Or shall we ask Service
provider to increase the MTU [ or place protocol converter that support
higher MTU]

 

 

 

Appreciate if you could help me with proper solution.

 

Dipesh Basnet



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list