[c-nsp] ASR opinions..

[Andrew K.]

Here is what the TAC SE replied when I asked him.

Hi Andrew,

No such information is available but you can check in feature list for 
the support.
Check with your NCE or account manager if they can contact DE as this is 
new design.
Thanks,



On 8/24/2011 3:15 PM, Rinse Kloek wrote:
> Is it planned to make more than one member link be supported in IOS-XE 
> 3.4 with MLPoE ?
>
> On 22-8-2011 15:55, Andrew K. wrote:
>> We were having issues using an ASR1002-F and ASR1002 as an LNS 
>> termination L2TP/PTA sessions.
>>
>> This has been fixed in the latest IOS release, the bugID for this 
>> issue was CSCtj44098.
>>
>> An other issue with the ASR as LNS is PPPoE Multilink.
>>
>> IOS-XE 3.4 did introduce MLPoE support, but only one member link is 
>> supported at this time.
>>
>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ios_xe/wan/configuration/guide/wan_cfg_mlppp_conn_xe_ps11174_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1200544 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/2011 12:55 AM, John Elliot wrote:
>>>> If you mean FHRP's like HSRP, VRRP or GLBP, no. But I
>>>> suspect those should be pretty stock features with nothing
>>>> major to worry about.
>>>
>>> Cheers - hopefully someone has a couple of 1000's setup in a 
>>> redundant fashion(w/ hsrp etc) that can comment  ;)
>>>
>>>> Yes, you should be fine if you're running the latest code.
>>>> However, I now remember that we were unable to run QoS
>>>> (ingress marking) on an LACP interface. Cisco call the
>>>> feature GEC QoS, which makes you wonder if the problem will
>>>> re-surface when doing 10Gbps LACP. At any rate, Cisco said
>>>> this should be available in IOS XE 3.4S. Suffice it to say,
>>>> we haven't tested this yet. That said, Cisco said QoS
>>>> capabilities on LACP sub-interfaces was supported - weird.
>>>>
>>> Thanks - Yes we run portchans, so portchan subints is where we apply 
>>> qos policies..so egress is ok, ingress is not(currently)?
>>>
>>>> One other thing that wasn't available for us at the time was
>>>> MPLS-TE support on LACP links. We swapped these routers out
>>>> for ASR9000's, so don't know whether MPLS-TE on LACP links
>>>> is now possible.
>>>>
>>> Not currently doing any TE, so hopefully if we ever do, it will be 
>>> available...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Like I said, the main problems with the ASR1000 is the
>>>> software.
>>>>
>>>>>> Netflow is also something we utilise on the existing
>>>>>> 7200's - asr's netflow functional?
>>>> We're running FNF on the ASR1002's. No major drama, but then
>>>> again we're just doing trending and TE management.
>>>
>>> We use it for billing, so pretty important that it works well  ;)
>>> Thanks again Mark - really appreciate it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>