[c-nsp] ASR opinions..

Mack McBride mack.mcbride at viawest.com
Mon Aug 29 15:08:17 EDT 2011


I would recommend a default to the core from the device to achieve ping/traceroute.

If you are need the route reflector to issue withdraws on routes in the OSPF table disappearing this
can be accomplished by using a floating null route to those ips.

Mack

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2011 11:04 AM
To: robert at raszuk.net
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR opinions..

On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:58:06 AM Robert Raszuk wrote:

> You do not need any BGP route to be send to RIB and FIB if you are 
> control plane only router (example Route Reflector).

Right, I suppose what I meant was both technical and operational considerations. If our NOC happen to be troubleshooting routing on the route reflector, and suddenly need to ping/traceroute to an address, the potential for not having an entry in the FIB despite its presence in the RIB could cause massive confusion.

Mark.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list