[c-nsp] Cisco 6500/SUP720-3B EtherChannel Sample ?

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 02:52:16 AM Kevin Loch wrote:

> Unless you want to inter operate with other vendors.  If
> you do that at all it makes sense to use LACP everywhere
> for consistency.

We always use the open standard (in this case, LACP) even 
though inter-op isn't the case. You just never know when it 
will be, and you don't want to spending any more time 
deploying new features than you should :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110831/88eacac2/attachment.pgp>