[c-nsp] Cisco 650x sup2 / sup32 configuration - what makes sense?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Dec 8 11:04:46 EST 2011


On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:58:41AM -0500, Jon Lewis wrote:
> Just to clarify, as I understand it, this (shared buffers) is an issue 
> with the 6148-GE-TX, but not with the 6148A-GE-TX, which according to 
> cisco documentation has much larger buffers and they're per port, not 
> shared by the ports in each 8 port group.  

Thanks for clarifying.  Yes, this is much more reasonable.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111208/6e6dcf0f/attachment-0001.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list