[c-nsp] GSR 12410 vs XR 12410

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Dec 8 13:31:31 EST 2011


On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:47:59AM -0800, Mack McBride wrote:
> The 6500 product line has roadmap out to 2020 and beyond.
> Keep in mind that the ASR platforms support much larger route tables than
> the 6500.  The 6500 is probably not going to be viable for full routing tables
> in two years giving the de-aggregation expected in the IPv4 space.

How many routing table slots will the ASRs (which ones, btw, 1k, 9k, 9xx?)

Sup720-XL and Sup-2T for the 6500 give me 1 million, which we'll partition
to something like 600k IPv4 / 200k IPv6, which will be fine for us for 
many years to come - but we don't take full routing tables anyway, filtering
out /24+/23 more-specifics from non-RIPE-/8s (adding a default route).

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111208/7812eb3d/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list