[c-nsp] Combining v4 and v6 Route-Maps for BGP Peers

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday, February 05, 2011 06:09:56 am chip wrote:

> +1 for separate sets of route-maps

We also use separate routing policies for both address 
families. It's additional work, but leaves you sleeping 
better at night.

Also, you never know what advantages this separation could 
bring in the future :-).

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110205/a12d6e51/attachment.pgp>