[c-nsp] Older Cisco Routers - which one to go with?
Jared Mauch
jared at puck.nether.net
Thu Feb 17 15:06:22 EST 2011
Not all routers by cisco CPU switch the traffic. This is the case in these low end devices, so I can understand why you might think they all are that way.
Jared Mauch
On Feb 17, 2011, at 11:27 AM, James <james at tridentnet.net> wrote:
> Graham
>
> I'd go with the 2800 series. Like all Cisco routers they process traffic on the CPU. The 2800 have a much faster CPU than the old 2600XM, even a 2651XM.
>
> Surely a NPE-400 is cheaper than a 2801. You can pick up a 7206VXR NPE-400 for like £250 these days.
>
>
> James
>
>
> On 17 Feb 2011, at 19:01, Graham Wooden wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> It's a toss-up between a 2651XM or a 2801 (because of budget constraints), for a 20Mb Ethernet circuit that will do moderate QoS and ACLs. No BGP, just static routes.
>>
>> The IOS's on both are relatively recent IP Services, and both have their RAM maxed.
>>
>> I am leaning on using the 2801, but thought to throw this out there and see any recommendations based on prior experience.
>>
>> What would you use between the two? Unfortunately, these are the only two that I can go with, or I would have sealed this decision shut with a 7200XVR w/ NPE-400 and call it done.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list