[c-nsp] Basic Etherchannel Question

[Mikael Abrahamsson]

On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Phil Mayers wrote:

> Using LACP is probably better than not. It might not detect all faults, but 
> it'll probably be better than nothing and it's hard to imagine it causing 
> problems. LACP is pretty mature these days.

Etherchannel without LACP + turning off autoneg is a disaster waiting to 
happen. You want LACP at all times so that a link that doesn't work or is 
one-way up doesn't carry traffic.

There are enough failure scenarios anyway, no need to add this as well.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se