[c-nsp] Enabling IPv6 on 2951 with VRF consumed 240MB of RAM. Why?
Jay Nakamura
zeusdadog at gmail.com
Tue Jan 25 19:44:09 EST 2011
So, here is top part of sh proc mem sorted
PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process
310 0 1746803856 971712708 450082968 0 0 BGP Router
158 0 212638192 94411816 121685252 0 0 IP RIB Update
83 0 736073272 4103108932 79536900 0 0 BGP Scanner
0 0 189564756 98708008 73904172 0 0 *Init*
And here is one from a very similarly configured router without IPv6 configured
304 0 2261872496 1184611460 322133152 0 0 BGP Router
0 0 203197580 101370688 74960344 0 0 *Init*
158 0 129733184 67410676 61083004 0 0 IP RIB Update
194 0 8627476 2168402988 2941908 0 0 BGP Scanner
1 0 66030312 64166728 1936852 0 0 Chunk Manager
0 0 2118799528 2123952492 688840 3534604 0 *Dead*
253 0 975796720 915434860 547712 0 0 OSPF-1 Router
2011/1/25 Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>:
> On 2011-01-25 20:52, Jay Nakamura wrote:
>
>> Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b)
>> Largest(b)
>> Processor 117804CC 793246516 716103208 77143308 76800456
>> 76068796
>>
>> This is without taking any routes or putting any IPv6 IP on the
>> interfaces.
>>
>> Is this normal? Is it pre-allocating something? Is there a way to
>> some how reduce the usage? We are in the process of adding memory but
>> I will feel more comfortable knowing what ate up that much memory.
>
> Show the 'show proc mem sorted'.
>
> --
> "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski
> you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromirski at jabber.org
> about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list