[c-nsp] Enabling IPv6 on 2951 with VRF consumed 240MB of RAM. Why?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Jan 26 04:10:56 EST 2011
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 02:52:42PM -0500, Jay Nakamura wrote:
> I am in the process of implementing IPv6 so I enabled IPv6 on the
> router on that one VRF and BGP. Now just enabling it consumed 260MB
> of RAM
How exactly did you "enable IPv6"?
I have no box with 15.0 + BGP + IPv6 right now, so I can't check - but
for older IOSes, IPv6 has fairly small impact on memory consumption.
Cisco>sh bgp ipv6 su
4374 network entries using 581742 bytes of memory
38490 path entries using 2771280 bytes of memory
...
Cisco>sh proc mem sort
Total: 39237408, Used: 22215864, Free: 17021544
PID TTY Allocated Freed Holding Getbufs Retbufs Process
91 0 51770188 7991604 10075460 0 0 BGP Router
Cisco>sh mem
Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b)
Processor 61A948E0 39237408 22217656 17019752 15261448 16350452
this is a 4700M with a 12.3-ish IOS, having 6 full IPv6 BGP peers and
a number of partial IPv6 BGP peers. 64Mb RAM, 17Mb free.
No IPv4 BGP and no VRFs, though.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110126/8eb57301/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list