[c-nsp] Move from SXI4 to SXI5

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:57:39PM -0800, Mack McBride wrote:
> I have only encountered one bug (Cisco internal bug - not public) related to IPv6 routes covering ::/96
> You will get a health test fail on reboot. The sup will register a minor error and the 67xx blades with DFC will fail to boot due to major error.  Work around is to avoid statics for default or routes covering ::/96.  
> ACLs can cover the ::/96 instead of null routes.

Ugh.  This is scary.  Do you have a bug ID?  (Even if it's internal, it
might be useful to give to TAC to have them tell me when it's fixed...)

Just testing... rebooting a Sup720-10G with SXI5 and a static IPv6 default
route (lab router, and for the SXI5 testing, it didn't have IPv6 on it yet),
and I don't see anything unusual in the messages on the console.  No DFC
modules, though, but I had expected to see something for the Sup...

*Jan 27 08:08:50: %FABRIC-SP-5-FABRIC_MODULE_ACTIVE: The Switch Fabric Module in slot 5 became active.
*Jan 27 09:08:53: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_COMPLETE: Module 5: Running Complete Diagnostics...
*Jan 27 09:09:06: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 5: Passed Online Diagnostics

What sort of log message do you see?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110127/d788e8da/attachment.pgp>