[c-nsp] queue drops on interfaces possibly explained by autonegotiate ?

[Randy]

No. autonegotiate can only-help. It does not hurt!
Input queue-drops also, in your case is not tied to the # of l2tp tunnels.

If a sh int count errors indicates 0 drops due to alignment errors, FCS/CRC errors, duplex mismatches symbol-errors etc, it is more than likely you are experiencing the effects of bursty-traffic.
HTH
./Randy


--- On Sat, 7/23/11, Rogelio <scubacuda at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Rogelio <scubacuda at gmail.com>
> Subject: [c-nsp] queue drops on interfaces possibly explained by autonegotiate ?
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Saturday, July 23, 2011, 5:00 PM
> I'm comparing two similarly
> configured Cisco 7201 routers and trying to figure out why
> one (with few L2TP tunnels) is getting more queue drops than
> another (with many L2TP tunnels).
> 
> The only difference I see is that one router (with fewer
> tunnels and lots of queue drops) has autonegotiate on his
> interfaces.
> 
> Could that explain the queue drops?  Or should I be
> looking elsewhere?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>