[c-nsp] recomended 12 dot IOS for 7206/G2

[Pete Lumbis]

My only comment here is that 12.4T became 15.0M.

Also they aren't really doing anything else for 12.4 mainline so you
are probably better off with 15.0M or 12.4.T code anyhow.

12.2SR (latest) is also pretty solid code.

15M is geared more towards your general purpose deployments, while SR
code is based on the 7600's code train and geared more toward the
service provider space.

Generally my experience has been to run 15M latest unless you have a
reason not to. There is always the risk of regressions (bugs caused by
fixing other bugs), but generally the later the rebuild (the last
number) the more stable the release.

-Pete

On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:42:39AM +1000, Phil Pierotti wrote:
>> I was just wondering what the consensus recommended 12 dot something IOS is
>> for  L2TP/MPLS (L3VPN) use these days.
>>
>> No ATM, no fancy voice stuff, nothing NAT and barely any ACLs.
>
> I'd go with "12.4 main" or "15.0 main".
>
> 12-with-letters for 7200 seems to cause pain (these days).  But some folks
> are using 12.2SRE* and can still talk, so maybe things have improved.
>
> (Not that all of this wouldn't be in the mailing list archives).
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>