[c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?

[Vinny_Abello at Dell.com]

Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?

-Vinny

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:38 AM
To: Jon Lewis
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?

On 15/06/2011 04:05, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:
>> Does uRPF cut the FIB/TCAM in half on a 6500/Sup720 like it does a Sup2?
>
> No...but it has the annoying issue of only being able to do one flavor of
> uRPF on the whole box. Any ports configured for it will do whichever type
> is configured last. So it does reachable via rx or reachable via any...pick
> one. Don't try using the other.

Also, ipv6 urpf on the sup720 causes ipv6 traffic to be punted to the RP.

Nick  . o O ( but at least it's supported, right?  argh )
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/