[c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?

[LM]

Is the same in 7600

El 15/06/11 18:46, Vinny_Abello at Dell.com escribió:
> Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?
>
> -Vinny
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:38 AM
> To: Jon Lewis
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?
>
> On 15/06/2011 04:05, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:
>>> Does uRPF cut the FIB/TCAM in half on a 6500/Sup720 like it does a Sup2?
>> No...but it has the annoying issue of only being able to do one flavor of
>> uRPF on the whole box. Any ports configured for it will do whichever type
>> is configured last. So it does reachable via rx or reachable via any...pick
>> one. Don't try using the other.
> Also, ipv6 urpf on the sup720 causes ipv6 traffic to be punted to the RP.
>
> Nick  . o O ( but at least it's supported, right?  argh )
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/