[c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?

[Vinny Abello]

I consider that the same platform. ;)

-Vinny

On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:25 AM, LM <asturluismi at gmail.com> wrote:

> Is the same in 7600
> 
> El 15/06/11 18:46, Vinny_Abello at Dell.com escribió:
>> Oh yuck, really?? Is this a limitation of the platform?
>> 
>> -Vinny
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Hilliard
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:38 AM
>> To: Jon Lewis
>> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] uRPF lacking on ME3600X?
>> 
>> On 15/06/2011 04:05, Jon Lewis wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:
>>>> Does uRPF cut the FIB/TCAM in half on a 6500/Sup720 like it does a Sup2?
>>> No...but it has the annoying issue of only being able to do one flavor of
>>> uRPF on the whole box. Any ports configured for it will do whichever type
>>> is configured last. So it does reachable via rx or reachable via any...pick
>>> one. Don't try using the other.
>> Also, ipv6 urpf on the sup720 causes ipv6 traffic to be punted to the RP.
>> 
>> Nick  . o O ( but at least it's supported, right?  argh )
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/