[c-nsp] Replacing a 7206VXR w/ NPE-G1 with Sup720-3BXL w/ WS-X6408A-GBIC
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Jun 29 13:16:30 EDT 2011
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 04:14:20PM +0100, Matthew.Coleman-Hamilton at servicebirmingham.co.uk wrote:
> Our Internet BGP tier is currently provided by a pair of 7206VXR routers
> with NPE-G1s which are getting quite long in the tooth. We've recently
> been able to reclaim a pair of Sup720-3BXLs and the associated 6509
> chassis'. Its our intention to retire the 7206s and replace them with the
> 6509s /w Sup720s but we require 6 GigE interfaces per box. We have a pair
> of WS-X6408A-GBIC 'classic bus' linecards on the shelf (no spare 65XX or
> 67XX modules unfortunately) but my question is whether using the
> WS-X6408A-GBIC to provide port capacity is a good or bad idea in this
> scenario?
It will work just fine, given that you're not going to max out the bus
with a single 8G card :-)
[..]
> My real concern is that I've found two different Cisco documents that
> describe the Forwarding-Engine Architecture differently for classic
> linecards.
> This link :-
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet0900aecd801459a7.html
> states that "the Supervisor engine CPU makes forwarding decision"
That's not fully correct - it's "the Supervisor engine" (as opposed to
"the DFC card on a 6700 module+DFC") but not "the CPU".
> and this link:-
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet0900aecd8017376e.html
> states that "Centralized Cisco Express Forwarding engine located on
> supervisor policy feature card (PFC) makes forwarding decision"
The PFC is part of the Supervisor engine.
> As the 6500 series is a hardware-based platform I'm keen to make use of
> hardware-supported features where available and not experience unexpected
> issues from high CPU utilisation.
> Can anyone confirm exactly how traffic will be forwarded by the
> Sup720-3BXL with a WS-X6408A-GBIC in the chassis?
Bus, PFC, Hardware. Unless you hit one of the (rare) feature combinations
that require CPU-based CEF on the Sup720.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110629/78f74172/attachment.pgp>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list