[c-nsp] ASA 8.3 full-tunnel VPN paradox...

Ryan West rwest at zyedge.com
Wed Jun 29 16:45:48 EDT 2011


On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 16:30:13, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Subject: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3 full-tunnel VPN paradox...
> 
> I'm working on replacing an old PIX VPN setup with a new ASA, and 
> having a bear of a time with a full tunnel setup.
> 
> The PIX (old 6.x software) has setups for both split-tunnel and 
> full-tunnel profiles.
> It is *not* the outbound gateway for internet-destined traffic.
> 
> Our internet traffic goes from the border to a pair of active/active 
> ASAs along with our perimeter protection, IPS, and other assorted 
> goodies, so that is the desired path for the full-tunnel traffic.  
> Since the active/active pair can't do VPN, another ASA is serving that 
> purpose (inside the other ASAs), also connected to our core.
> 
> On the PIX, there is a default route on both the "outside" and "inside"
> interfaces thusly:
> 
> > utc-pix# sho route | i 0.0.0.0
> >         outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 aaa.bbb.ccc.246 1 OTHER static
> >         inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 aaa.bbb.ccc.20 10 OTHER static
> 
> Anything connecting to the VPN (or otherwise hitting the outside 
> interface) follows the outside route.
> 
> Any VPN-originated traffic on the full tunnel follows the inside route.
> 
> The ASA is not behaving this way... it wants to "always" follow the 
> outside route for the VPN-originated full-tunnel traffic if I include 
> both routes (with unequal weights, as it doesn't allow them to be the same).
> 
> If I define an explicit outside route to where I VPN from, and remove 
> the default outside route, it works perfectly.
> 
> Is there something obvious I'm missing here to make it behave like the 
> PIX does?
> 

Try the keyword 'tunneled' at the end of the route statement.

-ryan



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list