[c-nsp] 6500/BGP/full route tables [even more] confusing...
Jeff Kell
jeff-kell at utc.edu
Mon Mar 28 11:38:05 EDT 2011
On 3/26/2011 3:27 PM, Tim Stevenson wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Removing the DFC from a 65xx card & letting the PFC do the work is HIGHLY preferable
> to letting traffic punt for your shortest mask prefixes, which are the ones that won't
> get into the h/w if you blow out the FIB TCAM.
Follow-up summary... kudos to Tim for the clear list of options. I have taken custody
of the problem daughtercard away from the GBIC blade and all is well... $0 budget
upgrade :)
> Router#show platform hardware capacity system
> System Resources
> *PFC operating mode: PFC3CXL*
> Supervisor redundancy mode: administratively sso, operationally sso
> Switching resources: Module Part number Series CEF mode
> 3 WS-X6516-GBIC CEF256 CEF
> 5 VS-S720-10G supervisor CEF
> 6 VS-S720-10G supervisor CEF
> Router#show platform hardware capacity pfc
> L2 Forwarding Resources
> MAC Table usage: Module Collisions Total Used %Used
> 5 0 98304 3 1%
> 6 0 98304 4 1%
>
> VPN CAM usage: Total Used %Used
> 512 0 0%
> *L3 Forwarding Resources
> FIB TCAM usage: Total Used %Used
> 72 bits (IPv4, MPLS, EoM) 524288 25 1%
> 144 bits (IP mcast, IPv6) 262144 8 1%*
>
> detail: Protocol Used %Used
> IPv4 25 1%
> MPLS 0 0%
> EoM 0 0%
>
> IPv6 1 1%
> IPv4 mcast 4 1%
> IPv6 mcast 3 1%
>
> Adjacency usage: Total Used %Used
> 1048576 167 1%
Jeff
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list