[c-nsp] SXJ - The good, the bad, the ugly?

Jared Mauch jared at puck.nether.net
Tue May 3 09:55:00 EDT 2011


On May 3, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Brandon Ewing wrote:

> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:48:23AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> There is a memory leak that is not fixed if you run BGP.
>> 
>> Jared Mauch
>> 
> 
> Is this the same one that was present earlier in the SXI releases, where a
> neighbor in Idle or Active states leaks memory?  I thought they had that 
> fixed around SXI4 or SXI5

CSCsw63003

Routing

Continous BGP activity may result in increasing amounts of memory held

Symptoms: 
Memory increase occurs in 'BGP Router' process due to BGP path attributes. Memory used by this process increases constantly and so do the BGP path attributes while the number of routes does not increase.

Not sure why they don't call this a "leak" but apparently they have a different way to describe it.

Basically, if you use BGP, don't use SXJ as it will leak itself to death over a period of time, possibly as short as 4 weeks with full routes.

- Jared


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list