[c-nsp] SXJ - The good, the bad, the ugly?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 09:32:32AM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> Does this mean they gave up on modular classic IOS?

Seems like it.  But given how pathetic that effort was - no buy-in from
any other BUs, thus quite limited resources for development, and thus no
effective modularity at all, except for fully-modular CDP (yay!) - this 
was a logical step to expect.

It's frustrating me quite some, especially since we bought 6500/Sup720
instead of 7600/RSP720 specifically because we wanted modularity - but
yeah, Cisco politics.

Let's see whether IOS XE will ever mature out of "oh, yes, we have a
fully modular operating system and then there's the IOS process running
as a single big blob on top of it!"...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110504/07829c20/attachment.pgp>