[c-nsp] VPLS on ME3600X / ME3800X

[Waris Sagheer (waris)]

Christian,

In 12.2(52)EY, ME3800X/ME3600X can only be a spoke in case of H-VPLS
since it supports VPWS.
VPLS will be supported on ME3800X and ME3600X in 15.1(2)EY coming out in
June 2011.
It'll support flat as well as H-VPLS.
L2VPN preferred path TE is supported along with TE support in case of
L3VPN in 12.2(52)EY.
The documentation needs to be fixed.

-Waris


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of christian meutes
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 7:17 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] VPLS on ME3600X / ME3800X

Hi list,

does anyone know what kind of VPLS is supported on ME3600X and ME3800X?

The 12.2(52)EY Configuration Guide just mentions H-VPLS, but not in much
detail. Maybe someone knows right away if it's possible to build
VPLS-mesh
with kinda like "l2 vfi.."-configuration-style for meshing like ten of
them
with each having some dozens of L2-Domains with tens of vlans/ports.
I'am
fearing somehow that VPLS-capability on them is not that kind of VPLS
capability i'am interested in.

If it's just not supported yet, will it ever?

And, I read that LDP-Session on TE-Tunnel is not supported for L2VPN but
for L3VPN it is. What's the difference here that one works and the other
not? Is that "feature" coming in the future?

cheers
Christian


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/