[c-nsp] Open Source netflow recommendations

[sthaug at nethelp.no]

> Difficult to understand why an MS-DPC is required for jflow v9.  The 
> additional overhead of netflowv9 is very low, and the actual cost of 
> running an MS-DPC can be quite high (i.e. extra slot which would otherwise 
> be used for a traffic blade).

Money? :-)

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no