[c-nsp] 6k Netflow To Be or Not To Be...

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:15:31AM -0600, Mark Mason wrote:
> Question of the day...
> Why turn on netflow in a 6k w/ SUP720-10G if netflow in 6k (minus the 
> SUP2T) is notoriously not good? 

Well, it has its limits, but it's much better than *not* having netflow
available.

Our network is too highly meshed to be able to set up tap probes everywhere
that interesting traffic might be seen, and taps on 10G ports do not come
cheap either...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111115/a9aaa508/attachment.pgp>