[c-nsp] IOS XR BGP

Nick Ryce Nick.Ryce at lumison.net
Thu Nov 24 07:53:32 EST 2011


Hi Adam,

That's great thanks.

I had just focused on the summary only part which only summarise less specific BGP routes.

Nick

-----Original Message-----
From: Vitkovsky, Adam [mailto:avitkovsky at emea.att.com]
Sent: 24 November 2011 12:20
To: Nick Ryce; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: IOS XR BGP

Same as in Jonos use the "aggregate" cmd:

2.    router bgp as-number
3.    address-family  { ipv4  | ipv6 } unicast
4.    aggregate-address address/mask-length  [ as-set ] [ as-confed-set ] [ summary-only ] [ route-policy route-policy-name ]

The as-set  keyword generates autonomous system set path information and community information from contributing paths.

The as-confed-set keyword generates autonomous system confederation set path information from contributing paths.

The summary-only  keyword filters all more specific routes from updates.

The route-policy route-policy-name  keyword and argument specify the route policy used to set the attributes of the aggregate route.


adam

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nick Ryce
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 11:49 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] IOS XR BGP

Hi,

I am moving from Juniper to Cisco ( IOS XR ) and am looking to emulate a certain feature ( aggregate addressing for BGP )

In Junos I can set routing-options aggregate route x.x.x.x/19 . If there is a less specific contributing route from IGP then the aggregate is announced through BGP.

In BGP on IOS XR you use the network statement network x.x.x.x/19 now you need to have an exact route for this ( normally setting a static route ).  This will not suit my requirements as if we lose IGP on that router I would like to stop announcing the ranges via BGP but the static route will still be there and I will theoretically blackhole traffic.

Any ideas how to allow BGP to announce an aggregate route when there is less specific in IGP would be a great help.


Thanks

Nick



________________________________
--

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
Errors and omissions excepted. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Lumison.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Lumison accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

--

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any
offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Lumison.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses.  Lumison accept no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list