[c-nsp] ASA vs. ASR for large Wireless NAT deployment ?

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, December 01, 2011 09:07:15 AM Tom Lanyon wrote:

> It's not that it doesn't work, it's not supported. :)
> 
> 	(config)#nat64 prefix stateful 64:ff9b::/96
> 	%NAT64: Cannot use the well-known prefix 
64:FF9B::/96
> for a stateful prefix

If I understand the documentation correctly, it seems to 
suggest that the WKP only kicks in if another Pref64 isn't 
defined by the operator:

	"Well Known Prefix

	The Well Known Prefix 64:FF9B::/96 is supported for
	Stateful NAT64. During a stateful translation, if no
	stateful prefix is configured (either on the
	interface or globally), the WKP prefix is used to
	translate the IPv4 host addresses."

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111201/7a217b4e/attachment.sig>