[c-nsp] C7600 vs. ASR 9000

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, October 05, 2011 02:12:53 AM Mack McBride 
wrote:

> It is an improvement but not much (with current gen RP).
> The primary improvement is using both fabric channels as
> active/active.

On the software side, one thing I would say is that before 
you buy an ASR9000, make sure RPL does what you want. If it 
doesn't, that's not an excuse not to buy it either, but just 
one to ask your SE to get the features you want implemented.

As I've said on this list before, the RPL model, while much 
improved from the route-map one, is less intuitive and not 
on par with what we've known from classic IOS.

A number of features I requested are in the works, but your 
environment might be a little more different.

Simple installations should not have an issue, as RPL covers 
pretty much everything for your basic routing policy.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20111005/36315b7f/attachment.pgp>