[c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, September 02, 2011 02:15:06 PM Vincent Touchard 
wrote:

> While speaking of 3600X, we are thinking about using 2 of
> them at each end of a 10G point-to-point WAN link,
> possibly running VPLS (not sure we really need this,
> QinQ may suffise). According to our SE, VPLS is
> supported but they have never tested our topology (ie
> only 2 boxes put back to back) and are appearantly not
> 100% sure it will work.

If your topology is just these 2 devices back-to-back, why 
would you want to complicate your life with things like VPLS 
and such?

802.1Q Trunking should be simple enough. You could even do 
some IP routing if necessary, but I think VPLS would be 
overkill in this topology.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110902/f123b053/attachment.pgp>