[c-nsp] ME 3600X questions

[Mark Tinka]

On Friday, September 02, 2011 06:30:27 PM Vincent Touchard 
wrote:

> The goal is to extend site A to site B during their move.
> On the LAN side, one interface per "department" and
> several vlans per interface. We do not control the
> network of the departments (number of vlans, vlan ids,
> size of broadcast domains, ...). Solution #1 whould be
> to do QinQ, with one outer vlan per department.

Ah, okay. See what you mean now.

> We are considering EoMPLS/VPLS as an alternative to QinQ,
> but have little to no experience with it.

You could hybrid them, although you know best about your 
topology/requirements to decide that.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110903/34098b94/attachment.pgp>