[c-nsp] ASA vs ISR ZBFW

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday, September 10, 2011 01:16:31 AM Nick Hilliard 
wrote:

> i'm tending to run a local ospf instance on the fw-router
> link and then redistributing from ospf->bgp on the
> next-hop router.  Really it would be much better to have
> fw support for bgp, but the ASA is such an enterprise
> box that they don't understand why there might be an
> advantage to using anything other than eigrp.  sigh.

Fodder for the ASR1000 BU.

The box certainly has the tech. to be a decent-enough 
firewall, and is obviously a router by all accounts.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20110910/0419bcf5/attachment-0001.pgp>