[c-nsp] 1811/1841 Performance with PPPOE

[Tom Storey]

The 1811 is supposedly even more powerful than the low end 2800's. And
on that note, Ive seen a 2801 acting as a LAC (so thats accept PPPoE
and forward on via L2TP) for ~100 sessions and barely breaking a
sweat. Traffic levels were quite low though (i.e. <= 10mbit/sec
perhaps), so that might explain the low CPU util.

On 2 April 2012 14:39, Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org> wrote:
> Hey folks.
>
>
>
> Just wondering regarding performance impacts on 1811/1841 when terminating
> PPPOE on the router?  The "router spec sheet" from Cisco
> (http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/router
> performance.pdf) shows about 35Mb/s of traffic on one of these routers but
> if you also have 100-150 PPPOE users terminating on the router, how much
> does this affect the throughput numbers?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/