[c-nsp] ASR9000v and distance

[Aled Morris]

The ASR9000v satellite doesn't sound like much of an improvement over
simply trunking to a conventional L2 switch and having each switchport
presented as a separate VLAN to the router for L3 processing.

The ability to manage it all with one instance of IOS might be simpler but
using discrete L2 switches seems to have a lot more flexibility.

What am I missing?

Aled


On 7 April 2012 12:30, Asbjorn Hojmark <lists at hojmark.org> wrote:

> 1) Not currently
> 2) Yes
> 3) There is no local switching
>
> -A
>
> Sent from my tablet; excuse brevity
>
> On 07/04/2012, at 13.59, Robert Hass <robhass at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > I have three questions regarding ASR9000v deployments:
> >
> > 1) Can I connect one ASR9000v to two ASR9010 (to have redundancy). If
> > yes are these ASR9010 have to be direct interconnected ?
> > 2) Can ASR9000v be eg. 200-300KM away from ASR9010 (10GE over DWDM).
> > 3) Are ASR9000v providing local switching between GE ports or all
> > traffic is going to upper layer (ASR9010) and going back to ASR9000v ?
> >
> > Rob
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>