[c-nsp] OSPF's handling of secondary IP addresses on subinterfaces

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:11:10PM -0500, Christopher J. Wargaski wrote:
>    To get around that, you could probably a static route with next hop of
> Null0 and tag then make a route map to advertise it.

This will only work if the static route could win against a connected
route - which it will never do (unless more specific, and in that case,
you have just null-routed your network, instead of connected it).

We just do "redistribute connected subnets" if we want connected
subnets in OSPF.  Can be qualified by a route-map if needed.

(The original poster could just go away from using IPv4... IPv6 doesn't
have this funny idea about "primary" and "secondary" networks, and
neither does OSPFv3)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20120407/1b4c6e73/attachment.sig>