[c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ?
Dave
dcostell-cisconsp at torzo.com
Mon Apr 30 11:40:40 EDT 2012
Thank you all for the responses. I actually found the PDF shortly after
sending the e-mail. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. (Also a part of
me was hoping the PDF was wrong). So for an office router that will do
GigE + VPN + NAT anyone have any recommendations ? Is it the ASR1k or
bust now days ?
Again, thanks all for the quick responses. I really appreciate it.
Dave
On 04/30/2012 08:30 AM, Mackinnon, Ian wrote:
> You are indeed missing something :-)
>
> The Cisco Router Performance Guide, first hit for "cisco router
> performance pdf" on google.
> It says a 2911 will top out at about 180M with no features.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dave
> Sent: 30 April 2012 15:43
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ?
>
> Good morning list,
>
> I apologize for what is a long winded explanation followed by what may
> be a 'common knowledge' type of question, but I did try google first to
> find this information and either I'm not using the correct search terms
> or I am truly missing something. I throw myself on the mercy of the list
> and humbly request the assistance of those with more experience than
> myself.
>
> We have a Cisco 2911 ISR with a 1Gig connection to our remote site and I
> am completely unable to get more than 100Mbps across this router. The
> closer I get to 100Mbps the higher the CPU load goes due to interrupts.
> We are running NAT and I have followed the troubleshooting proceedures
> from cisco regarding high cpu utilization due to interrupts.
>
> No interfaces have any access lists longer than 10 entries. I also tried
> both with and without NetFlow switching enabled.
>
> CEF is showing enabled and running on all interfaces, however I am
> seeing a large number of packets that are process switched. ( I assume
> due to NAT Translation)
>
> show alignment says that no alignment data has been recorded and no
> spurious memory references have been recorded.
>
> We have no voice ports or ATM interfaces
>
> currently running IOS 15.1(4)M3
>
> recently upgraded the memory on the router with a 2Gig stick.
>
> I'm at a complete loss as to what is happening unless this router is
> simply not capable of doing full gigE. I will happily provide output of
> any diagnostic commands if needed. Can someone even tell me if this
> rotuer is actually capable of hitting GigE speeds ?
>
> Thank you
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Atos and Atos Consulting are trading names used by the Atos group. The following trading entities are registered in England and Wales: Atos IT Services UK Limited (registered number 01245534), Atos Consulting Limited (registered number 04312380) and Atos IT Solutions and Services Limited (registered number 01203466) The registered office for each is at 4 Triton Square, Regents Place, London, NW1 3HG. The VAT No. for each is: GB232327983
>
> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee, and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you receive this e-mail in error, you are not authorised to copy, disclose, use or retain it. Please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your systems. As emails may be intercepted, amended or lost, they are not secure. Atos therefore can accept no liability for any errors or their content. Although Atos endeavours to maintain a virus-free network, we do not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and can accept no liability for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. The risks are deemed to be accepted by everyone who communicates with Atos by email.
> _______________________________________________________
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list