[c-nsp] Fwd: IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
Xu Hu
jstuxuhu0816 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 09:54:16 EDT 2012
Must use the TCP packets? I want to just use the ping packet to test the
effect of PMTUD. Is any simple way to test this feature?
Another thing, if use the iBGP to test, i find one show ip bgp neighbor
command as below, the MSS you mentioned is the "*Datagrams (max data
segment is 1460 bytes):*" ?
Thanks for your help.
Hu Xu
Router# *show ip bgp neighbors 172.16.232.178*
BGP neighbor is 172.16.232.178, remote AS 10, external link
Index 1, Offset 0, Mask 0x2
Inbound soft reconfiguration allowed
BGP version 4, remote router ID 172.16.232.178
BGP state = Established, table version = 27, up for 00:06:12
Last read 00:00:12, hold time is 180, keepalive interval is 60 seconds
Minimum time between advertisement runs is 30 seconds
Received 19 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue
Sent 17 messages, 0 notifications, 0 in queue
Inbound path policy configured
Route map for incoming advertisements is testing
Connections established 2; dropped 1
Connection state is ESTAB, I/O status: 1, unread input bytes: 0
Local host: 172.16.232.181, Local port: 11002
Foreign host: 172.16.232.178, Foreign port: 179
Enqueued packets for retransmit: 0, input: 0, saved: 0
Event Timers (current time is 0x530C294):
Timer Starts Wakeups Next
Retrans 12 0 0x0
TimeWait 0 0 0x0
AckHold 12 10 0x0
SendWnd 0 0 0x0
KeepAlive 0 0 0x0
GiveUp 0 0 0x0
PmtuAger 0 0 0x0
iss: 133981889 snduna: 133982166 sndnxt: 133982166 sndwnd: 16108
irs: 3317025518 rcvnxt: 3317025810 rcvwnd: 16093 delrcvwnd: 291
SRTT: 441 ms, RTTO: 2784 ms, RTV: 951 ms, KRTT: 0 ms
minRTT: 0 ms, maxRTT: 300 ms, ACK hold: 300 ms
Flags: higher precedence, nagle
*Datagrams (max data segment is 1460 bytes):*
Rcvd: 15 (out of order: 0), with data: 12, total data bytes: 291
Sent: 23 (retransmit: 0), with data: 11, total data bytes: 276
2012/8/1 Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) <oboehmer at cisco.com>
> Well, you need to create TCP connections to see the effect of PMTUD.. you
> could build an iBGP session across the test network, and play around with
> the minimum link MTU along the path. The MSS (shown in show bgp neighbor
> ..) should adapt as you change it..
>
> oli
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
> > bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Xu Hu
> > Sent: 01 August 2012 02:33
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
> >
> > Anybody have any good idea?
> >
> > Thanks advance for any inputs,
> > Xu Hu
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > > From: TJ <trejrco at gmail.com>
> > > Date: 1 August, 2012 5:23:46 GMT+08:00
> > > To: Xu Hu <jstuxuhu0816 at gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPV6 Path MTU DIscovery Test
> > > Reply-To: trejrco at gmail.com
> > >
> > > In order to test it, take one of the links along the path and change
> the
> > (IPv6) MTU to something smaller - say 1300B. Then send large packets,
> with
> > WireShark running. And no, you cannot disable PMTUD in IPv6.
> > >
> > > HTH!
> > > /TJ
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:43 AM, Xu Hu <jstuxuhu0816 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Experts,
> > >
> > > I have some queries about the PMTU for IPv6.
> > > 1. From my understanding, path MTU discovery in IPv6 allows a host to
> > > dynamically discover and adjust to differences in the MTU size of every
> > > link along a given data path, So the fragmentation is handled by the
> > > source, if i want to test this feature in the IPv6 network, anyone have
> > any
> > > good ideas?
> > > For example, as below topology, if i want to test the Path MTU
> discovery,
> > > how to test, i can ping from CE-1 to CE--2 with a specific IPv6 packet
> > > size.
> > > CE-1------PE-1------------PE-2--------CE-2
> > >
> > > 2. If i need to configure the Path MTU discovery, just one command
> > > mentioned in Cisco.com, which is "ipv6 flowset" under configuration
> mode.
> > > So if i want to disable that in test scenario, just using the "no ipv6
> > > flowset" is okay? Cisco don't mentioned that.
> > > By default, it is enable for ip routers or not?
> > >
> > > Thanks for any inputs.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Hu Xu
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list