[c-nsp] Sharing router uplinks?
Saku Ytti
saku at ytti.fi
Wed Aug 1 11:46:30 EDT 2012
On (2012-08-01 08:23 -0700), Erik Nelson wrote:
> What do others think of this? I have been unable to find anything on the web that says anything for or against. If anyone knows of authoritative guidelines on the web about this I would be very interested.
It is doable but not optimal. It is questionable if any benefits can be
extracted in well designed network this way.
- Usually core ports with no HQoS cost significantly less than edge ports
with HQoS. If you share core and edge, you need VLAN separation, which
means if you plan to run any QoS in core, you need HQoS cards making this
/more/ expensive than not sharing.
- You can possibly save port counts, but you lose hardware liveliness
detection, as you have switch between core devices. Which means high
convergence time (lower quality) and possibly increased complexity (BFD).
--
++ytti
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list