[c-nsp] Riverbed

Saxon Jones saxon.jones at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 11:37:59 EDT 2012

I only have experience with Cisco WAAS but if you're on anything with
decent latency (<10ms) they caused more (performance) problems for us than
they solved. For us the incremental cost of upgrading our bandwidth in most
locations was low enough that we didn't take WAAS out of the pilot (and we
preferred local services to WAAS where we have poor connections, due mostly
to the perceived reliability of those connections). This information is a
few years old, though.


On 9 August 2012 09:03, harbor235 <harbor235 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can anyone share the experiences with Riverbed products, does the
> optimization
> results justify the cost? Are there protocols that do not work well with
> the optimization
> process? With Cisco devices?
> I realize this is the the correct forum, but most people in this forum that
> require WAN optimization
> would also be in this forum.
> thank you
> Mike
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list