[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 117, Issue 64

[Randy]

May I suggest; when replying to a "digest" You change the *subject-line* appropriately.
./Randy

--- On Thu, 8/30/12, Michael Malitsky <malitsky at netabn.com> wrote:

> From: Michael Malitsky <malitsky at netabn.com>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 117, Issue 64
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Thursday, August 30, 2012, 4:14 PM
> This is a change requiring telco
> involvement, which means 30-60 days.
> So not feasible at the moment.
> 
> But I think more to the point, I have the same problems on
> the T1s that
> come in as DS3 channels.  And the pa-mc-t3 counters are
> almost perfectly
> clean.  I can post the results if it would be helpful.
> 
> Sincerely,
> Michael Malitsky
> 
> > ------------------------------
> > 
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:53:22 -0600
> > From: Tim Densmore <tdensmore at tarpit.cybermesa.com>
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7200 Line protocol bouncing
> > Message-ID: <503FB6A2.3000706 at tarpit.cybermesa.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> > 
> > On 8/30/2012 11:49 AM, Michael Malitsky wrote:
> > > This is a
> > > 7206VXR, with a PA-MC-T3 and a PA-MC-4T1 cards.
> > Is there a reason you have to run these T1s to the 4T1
> card?  The
> > pa-mc-t3 gives very good 24 hour PMs (show controllers
> t3 n/n/n
> > tabular), and the 4T1 does not (as far as I know at
> least- show
> > service-module isn't an option I see, and show serial
> gives nothing
> that
> > looks useful w/o a decoder ring).  If your
> circuits are dirty or
> taking
> > lots of slips, etc, you'd be able to see it easily on
> that card.
> > 
> > -TD
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>