[c-nsp] BGP Path Selection and next-hop reachability (IGP vs BGP)

[Nick Hilliard]

On 02/12/2012 12:48, Gert Doering wrote:
> either, but I refrained from ranting about it as people eventually might
> get bored).

but what do you expect for 2003-era hardware?  The sup720/rsp720 isn't a
prime target for Cisco at this stage and probably will become less and less
so.  At some stage, for better or worse, hardware refreshes are pretty
necessary.  And the pfc3 has so many really serious hardware limitations
(e.g. copp, ipv6, etc) that it's really not suitable for many customer
facing applications these days.

Nick