[c-nsp] Redistributing OSPF into another OSPF process

[Andriy Bilous]

Redistribution of networks local to the router is a non-recursive process.
static/connected->ospf1->ospf2 won't work, you need to redistribute them
explicitly into each process: static->ospf1 and static->ospf2 in your case.


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Murat Kaipov <mkkaipov at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello guys.
>
> I have an issue on my ME3800 with redistributing ospf process into another
> ospf. Not all routes appears on second ospf process.
>
> This is my config:
>
>
>
> router ospf 1
>
> router-id 172.24.203.241
>
> no auto-cost
>
> area 197 stub
>
> redistribute static subnets route-map STATIC-OSPF1
>
> redistribute ospf 65000 subnets
>
> redistribute bgp 65000
>
> passive-interface default
>
> no passive-interface Vlan42
>
> no passive-interface Vlan63
>
> no passive-interface Vlan512
>
> no passive-interface Vlan901
>
> no passive-interface Vlan1025
>
> no passive-interface Vlan3327
>
> no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/17
>
> no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/21
>
> no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/24
>
> default-metric 100
>
> bfd all-interfaces
>
>
>
> router ospf 65000
>
> no auto-cost
>
> redistribute ospf 1 subnets route-map OSPF1-OSPF65000
>
> passive-interface default
>
> no passive-interface Vlan101
>
> no passive-interface Vlan401
>
>
>
> ip route 172.24.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.24.11.97
>
>
>
> route-map STATIC-OSPF1 permit 10
>
> match ip address prefix-list GLOBAL-VrfPGW-PRIMARY
>
> set metric 100
>
>
>
> route-map OSPF1-OSPF65000 permit 10
>
> match ip address prefix-list OSPF1-OSPF65000
>
> set metric 50
>
>
>
> ip prefix-list GLOBAL-VrfPGW-PRIMARY seq 10 permit 172.24.0.0/16
>
> ip prefix-list OSPF1-OSPF65000 seq 5 permit 172.24.0.0/16
>
>
>
> So in first ospf process we see route 172.24.0.0 which was redistributed
> from static.
>
> sho ip ospf 1 database
>
>                 Type-5 AS External Link States
>
>
>
> Link ID         ADV Router      Age         Seq#       Checksum Tag
>
> 172.24.0.0      172.24.203.241  215         0x800001CF 0x00BBF5 0
>
> 172.24.17.224   172.24.203.243  1966        0x80000711 0x00D08C 0
>
> 172.24.200.2    172.24.200.206  1608        0x800023BD 0x004193 0
>
> 172.24.200.24   172.24.200.204  1256        0x80007E94 0x00860F 0
>
> 172.24.200.24   172.24.200.205  1418        0x80007E97 0x007A17 0
>
> 172.24.201.32   172.24.203.243  1966        0x80000F27 0x002423 0
>
> 172.24.202.48   172.24.203.241  970         0x80000003 0x004DC5 0
>
> 172.24.202.64   172.24.203.241  970         0x80000003 0x00AC56 0
>
> 172.24.203.129  172.24.203.241  970         0x80000003 0x003F7A 0
>
>
>
> In second ospf process we don't see route to 172.24.0.0.
>
> sho ip ospf 65000 database
>
> Link ID         ADV Router      Age         Seq#       Checksum Tag
>
> 172.24.17.0     172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00CC57 0
>
> 172.24.17.32    172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x008B78 0
>
> 172.24.17.64    172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00AA29 0
>
> 172.24.17.80    172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x000AB9 0
>
> 172.24.17.96    172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00B1F5 0
>
> 172.24.17.100   172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00891A 0
>
> 172.24.17.104   172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00495A 0
>
> 172.24.17.128   172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00C7DB 0
>
> 172.24.17.160   172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x0086FC 0
>
> 172.24.17.192   172.24.203.22   53          0x80000002 0x00A5AD 0
>
>
>
> Have any ideas?
>
> B.R.
>
> Murat Kaipov
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>